The Role of Design Controls in Medical Device Quality

The Poly Implant Prostheses (PIP) breast implant outrage was one of the most infamous patient security disappointments to have happened in clinical trials. The inserts were produced using a less expensive, modern evaluation silicone that was not affirmed for medical use and cracked effectively, prompting scarring and irritation. The decision of a low medical device quality material was extraordinary for these patients and it additionally prompted huge administrative change. 

As a quality head, you are answerable for setting up an organization’s medical device quality techniques and norms. You will likewise ensure that all creation measures meet both public and worldwide administrative guidelines. With regards to medical devices, the part of a quality expert includes creating and dealing with an product’s quality management system(QMS) and driving forward the producer’s administrative procedure. 

In medical device organizations, the medical device quality supervisor is subsequently answerable for directing consistence with the U.S. Food and Drug Agency (FDA), EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and other applicable structures. This implies offering administrative help for ventures, helping with item naming and supporting producers with their applications to the told body (NB). 

Prologue to configuration controls 

Configuration controls are a bunch of methods that makers incorporate with the plan and advancement (D&D) cycle to guarantee the plan converts into a device that is proper for its proposed use. Configuration controls connect the client necessities to the device’s plan sources of info and yields. This can enable quality directors to do essential errands, such as researching protests, overseeing specialized records like the Design History File (DHF), and organizing post-market observation (PMS) exercises before the device is taken to a NB. 

While auditing medical device non-conformance, you will hope to discover configuration controls set up for Class II and Class III devices like endoscopes, in light of the fact that these are regarded to be a higher danger. You will once in a while discover these controls in Class I devices except if they are being computerized with programming. 

One of the fundamental reasons that NBs review medical devices is that the maker has neglected to refresh its QMS when another danger emerges. Great correspondence between quality supervisors and makers can enable medical device quality experts to remain educated about any adjustments in the plan controls so they can deal with the QMS all the more adequately and consolidate any dangers into the pertinent documentation. 

For quality experts assessing medical devices, the needs are wellbeing and realizing that the item meets the client needs and prerequisites. One way that quality administrators can uphold administrative consistence and administer quality is by following and adding to the plan controls. This incorporates exploring objections and the methodology that the producer has followed to guarantee FDA or MDR consistence. Here are a portion of the manners in which that quality experts can utilize configuration controls to survey device quality. 

Understanding client prerequisites 

The obligation of a quality chief generally incorporates examining grumblings that have been made about the device. From a quality point of view, objections feature any verifiable shortcomings, and it can assist you with deciding if the item is currently at a standard where an application can be submitted to a NB. Makers will utilize the plan controls to archive these grievances close by the first client necessities. This can assist them with showing how patient requirements have been incorporated with the last plan. 

The client necessities recorded in the plan controls are taken care of into the device’s plan inputs, which subtleties the physical and execution prerequisites of a device. While surveying the nature of an endoscope, surgical tool or some other device, there are three prerequisites to consider. These incorporate useful necessities that portray what a device does, interface prerequisites that detail any qualities that are basic to tolerant interface and execution necessities that indicate how well it ought to perform. A careful evaluation implies thinking about each of the three kinds. 

While breaking down the plan controls of a medical device, you need to see however much detail as could be expected. It is acceptable practice for producers to be thorough and unambiguous with the goal that everything can be checked. This will make it simpler to decide if a device is successful in completing its planned reason. For example, saying that a surgical blade “must be sharp” is hazy and can’t be demonstrated with assurance. In the event that the producer determines that the surgical tool must be “adequate to cut substance consistently,” it would then be able to devise tests to determine if this has been accomplished. 

While checking the plan controls of a device, you additionally need to see however many plan contributions as would be prudent. This means that the producer has covered a wide scope of execution models and prerequisites. Having numerous contributions to survey permits you to do a more intensive interior review, fortifying the administrative procedure that you are overseeing. 

Following device quality 

Configuration controls give a review trail from the device’s client necessities to the last plan yield. Hearty plan controls will disclose to you whether the device addresses the issues of the client and on the off chance that it is sheltered to utilize. A nitty gritty D&D plan additionally makes it simpler to follow quality and screen the danger the executives cycle that the producer has set up. 

Recognizability is at the core of configuration controls, as they permit you to follow the different components of the device through the gracefully chain. Detectability is important for ISO 13485 and is critical to a solid QMS. 

It is acceptable practice for producers to make a detectability lattice—an even organization that rundowns the plan sources of info and yields as a feature of the approval and check measure. Producers can utilize the network to determine a relating yield for each plan input. For example, if the information expresses that the surgical blade must be sharp enough to easily slice through human tissue, the yield might be that the device must be sharp enough to finish a checked sharpness assessment. As a quality expert, you can peruse the lattice and decide if the info prerequisites and configuration inputs have been fulfilled by the eventual outcome. 

Producers that don’t have in-house involvement in administrative applications may decide to work with an independent FDA consistence expert to assist them with building their plan controls. Working together over the business with pros can build your certainty that you have the master abilities expected to improve your administrative system and smooth out the course to showcase for your items. 

The PIP implant embarrassment is an incredible token of what can happen when quality isn’t a need. While surveying medical devices for the U.S. market, plan controls give a helpful marker that all client necessities have been considered, so you can unquestionably follow quality from client needs to configuration yields.

Read More

Design controls for medical devices

New medical devices offer fresh opportunities for your company to improve health outcomes, push the boundaries of medical innovation, and grow your business. Who wouldn’t be excited about that? But these devices also carry varying levels of risk that must be carefully managed. As the product manufacturer, it’s your job to ensure that your medical device is both effective and safe for users whose health may be on the line. For all but the lowest-risk devices, the Food and Drug Administration will require proof that you have done just that. The first step in meeting the FDA’s requirements is to develop your medical device under Design Controls.

Design Controls, which are mandated by the FDA, represent a formalized approach to the development of Class II and Class III medical devices. This process includes many layers of required documentation that show the FDA exactly how you have provided for the safety and efficacy of your new device. In this article, we’ll explore the basics of Design Controls, including whether or not they apply to your situation and an overview of how they are typically incorporated into product development.

Guide to FDA Device Classification

Determining FDA classification of your medical device before you begin development is essential to creating an effective project strategy. First things first: You need to determine whether or not Design Controls are required for your planned medical device. To do that, you need to be crystal clear about what your device is intended to do. What problem will it solve? What assistance or therapy will your planned device deliver as a point of value to the end user? How will it work? The answers to these questions will determine the way the FDA will classify and therefore regulate your device.

The FDA recognizes three separate classes of medical devices: Classes I, II, and III. The individual classes take into consideration a product’s intended use, indications for use, and the level of risk associated with the product. Design Controls are required for all class II and III devices (these are the medium- and high-risk groups). The majority of class 1 devices, meanwhile, are exempt from this process.

Class I products comprise 47% of all medical devices. These low-risk products are intended to promote health and wellness in a general way. Examples include everything from bedpans and elastic bandages to many wellness apps. Most Class I devices are exempt from Design Controls, but they are also limited in how they’re used and in the claims they can make. For example, a Class I device can claim to promote weight loss, but it can’t claim to treat type 2 diabetes.

Class II, which includes 43% of all medical devices, represents medium-risk, non-invasive products. Examples include pregnancy testing kits, surgical needles, and x-ray machines — as well as the latest Apple Watch (more on that later).

Class III products, meanwhile, represent the highest-risk devices. These are typically invasive. Examples include implantable pacemakers and breast implants. Only about 10% of medical devices fall in Class III.

If you’re uncertain which Class your planned product will belong to, you can check out our “Guide to FDA Device Classification” above, or look at the FDA’s classification database or device classification panel. Additionally, we recommend contacting a regulatory consultant who can walk your team through the FDA requirements that will apply to your particular situation.

Design Controls for Class I Devices: A Lesson From Apple

Hopefully your interest was piqued when we mentioned that the Apple Watch is now considered a Class II medical device. In taking this additional step toward a Class II designation (including Design Controls), Apple gained a meaningful new advantage over competitors like FitBit. At the same time, Apple set itself up for a lateral move into both the medical and home health markets.

Make no mistake: A watch that is also a Class II medical device reflects and foreshadows a larger trend toward increasingly medical consumer home health care products. In many ways, this is the future of medical device design.

The takeaway for medical device companies? It’s worth considering Design Controls for certain consumer home health products that have traditionally been categorized as Class I devices. Pursuing Design Controls at the outset of the development process leaves the door open for a future Class II designation without having to reinvent the wheel in terms of meeting FDA requirements. For devices like the Apple Watch, making the leap to Class II status may be key to beating the competition.

Design Control Basics

Once you determine the need for Design Controls, it’s time to frame your development process around these requirements.

Following are the core components of Design Controls, which must be included in your product design process:

User Needs. In this phase, your team must clearly define the needs of your intended users and define how your device will meet those needs.

Design & Development Planning. Next, your team will need to prepare a design and development plan. This plan should reflect the specifics of how your team plans to handle each of the Design Controls in the development process.

Design Inputs. Design inputs describe the exact specifications of your product, including what it will do and how it will perform. As you might expect, these inputs are directly informed by your product’s User Needs.

Design Outputs. Design outputs document the exact design, materials and components that are required to physically build your medical device. Outputs may take the form of drawings and diagrams.

Design Review. At various points in the process, your team must conduct and sign off on formal design reviews. Design reviews give your team the opportunity to evaluate the design requirements and make sure that your product is on track to meet them.

Design Verification. In this step, your team will test the product in various ways to ensure that it has been developed correctly. In essence, design verification seeks to prove that your device works as intended.

Design Validation. Design validation is another way of testing your product to see if it works. However, in this case, you want to prove that your device works to actually meet your users’ needs as defined earlier in the process. Design validation is all about user testing.

Design Transfer. Design transfer is another way of saying design production. In this phase, which overlaps with design validation, you begin the process of actually producing your medical device.

Design Changes. Design Controls apply to the entire lifespan of a medical device, not just the initial development. Any revisions to a product’s original design must also follow Design Controls.

Each of the above Design Controls components must be included in your development process. However, it’s important to note that the FDA allows medical device companies the freedom to specify the exact processes by which they will do so. The most common approach to Design Controls is captured in what is known as a waterfall diagram. This diagram shows the relationship between each of the Design Controls over the course of a product’s development.

Regardless of how you approach product development, your firm must compile the documentation from your Design Controls activities in a master file called a Design History File (DHF). The DHF is ultimately made available to the FDA and must be kept up to date in the event of an audit.

The Design History File doesn’t just show all the steps taken in product development process to ensure the safety and efficacy of a product. It must also make clear the links between the various Design Controls. It’s your firm’s responsibility to ensure that the Design History File demonstrates the traceability of all the various Design Controls throughout the development process.

By now it should be clear that Design Controls will touch on every aspect of your product development process. It is therefore imperative that you identify the need for Design Controls early on and make a clear plan to execute them. This process is challenging, to be sure. But the good news is that Design Controls don’t just pave the way to FDA approval. They also pave the way to better, safer medical devices.

Read More